"Control-Flow Integrity for the Linux kernel: A Security Evaluation" is the work I've done for my Masters thesis where I analyze how the PaX Team's (public) RAP holds up to stop ROP when applied to the Linux kernel. You may want to check out chapter 3. alunos.dcc.fc.up.pt/~up20140…
6
66
5
204
this is a sad joke for a 'thesis' i'm afraid. you should have kept true to your word and kept us in the loop about your findings to avoid all these errors.
1
You should also keep true to your word and assume defeat as I've found ways to bypass RAP on the public test patch?
6
3
you're also wrong that the post-meltdown UDEREF is not available publicly, it's part of the 4.4 grsec release someone made late last year on github, you could have easily studied it instead of baseless speculation and false statements.
1
Where were you when I asked you about UDEREF? Oh that's right, no answer. This really shows how much you really colaborate with people.
2
1
i was waiting on you to deliver on your promise you made last november to me but clearly failed to do so. at the beginning i assumed you approached us in good faith but clearly all you can do is ad hominem attacks and not actual research.
1
I did come in good faith. I even commented with a few people how surprising it was you (in the very early stages) being nice and all. Then you start being your normal self, questions unanswered, I just thought you stopped caring.
1
Replying to @uid1000
in hindsight, you only pretended and i'm glad i didn't spend my very little free time on your questions that a net search would have answered. so evade your promise with more ad hominem, that won't change the fact that you never delivered but feel so entitled to demand help.

Sep 24, 2019 · 8:04 AM UTC

1
Replying to @paxteam
You would spend less time answering questions than you are right now arguing here, but not to worry, I think it's enough already. Good luck for the future!