"Control-Flow Integrity for the Linux kernel: A Security Evaluation" is the work I've done for my Masters thesis where I analyze how the PaX Team's (public) RAP holds up to stop ROP when applied to the Linux kernel. You may want to check out chapter 3. alunos.dcc.fc.up.pt/~up20140…
6
66
5
204
this is a sad joke for a 'thesis' i'm afraid. you should have kept true to your word and kept us in the loop about your findings to avoid all these errors.
1
You should also keep true to your word and assume defeat as I've found ways to bypass RAP on the public test patch?
6
3
you're also wrong that the post-meltdown UDEREF is not available publicly, it's part of the 4.4 grsec release someone made late last year on github, you could have easily studied it instead of baseless speculation and false statements.
1
Where were you when I asked you about UDEREF? Oh that's right, no answer. This really shows how much you really colaborate with people.
2
1
speaking of collaboration, last i looked we provided you with a lot of help way back in last november already whereas you gave us exactly nothing back, despite your promise to keep us in the loop about your findings. how do you explain that?
1
I asked you some questions in november, but I started working on the thesis in late february. So there's that time gap right there that might've ticked you off.
1
Replying to @uid1000
why are you evading the question? did you promise to share your findings with us or not? did you do so or not?

Sep 24, 2019 · 7:58 AM UTC

1
Replying to @paxteam
I did, when you were acting professionally. Then I changed my mind, it has to work both ways.
1
when did you change your mind and based on what? when did you tell us about your change of mind (never)? why did you then ask us about your thesis *just before* going public with it? questions, eternal questions...
1