For a pet project, I'm looking to list out some women who were active and influential in the web from 1995-2002, and not coming up with very many. Enlighten me, please?
225
131
66
212
Wow. What an explosion of loving awesomeness! Oh the memories. Yet as I think about this thread in relationship to the originating question, I can’t help but be reminded that...
4
2
19
The untold story of women and PoC impact is often how we knit things together in ways that boys can capitalize off of for $$.
4
7
1
33
technology being only the latest place where this happens; thinking of all those 'thanks to my wife for doing my maths proofs' thesis intros
2
14
Oh, Mary! That gets a gold star for first coffee spit-take of my morning. 😜 Turning it around: AS IF my nerdy medical husband could care to have taught #CSS specificity. He DID make a hella cup of coffee to send me on my workday way and was always supportive. That alone is rare.
2
10
the thanks for typing are bad enough (I bet the typists also fixed spelling, grammar & incomplete sentences for them) but proofs in math! ;)
1
3
Hence the spit-take. The "proofs in maths" rammed the point right on home where it needed to go. #LadiesOG I'm impressed - longest overtly positive mass conversation with meaning and purpose Twitter has seen in a very long time.
1
1
10
if the OP doesn't write up all of this history & community, someone else will have to ;)
2
7
See that's the thing. We should be writing our own history.
4
1
18
Folks were talking about number of followers. I follow almost everyone back in industry. I'm sure if you have a career and life you don't want to hear my invalid complaints. But why aren't we following each other to start with? Bump up or shuddup? (j/k but amiright?)
2
9
Brava Aliza. And yes, so much this. I think Jen Simmons and a few others brought up the issue of Wikipedia bios and ethical means of starting to do this for one another seems a good "do" project that would have far-reaching benefits. With WaSP we had focus Task Forces. It helped!
2
2
8