Also, regardless of what Russia did and what American politicians might have collaborated with them, *treason* has a SPECIFIC MEANING and
1
2
...this ALMOST CERTAINLY doesn't rise to it. So ppl like Wil Wheaton need to knock off throwing "treason" around; they sound like fascists.
2
...maybe? It makes me really fucking uncomfortable, with the very limited amount we currently know, to throw that word around tho
2
Technically Russia isn't our enemy. We're not at war.
2
Then why do I see a very deep freeze? @nycplayer
1
I certainly don't think we're friendly! But "at war" is a big deal and the framers of the Constitution defined
1
..."treason" SUPER-NARROWLY for very good reasons. That's *all* I'm saying here. Not excusing anything.
1
Assuming Russia tried to influence the election - and they probably did! - that's absolutely unacceptable.
1
I'm just really, really uncomfortable with some of the rhetoric i'm seeing from "my side" about all of this.
1
Replying to @adrienneleigh
There are only two sides. Those that want to evolve via compassion and those who prefer violence and manipulation. @adrienneleigh @nycplayer

Dec 12, 2016 · 12:50 AM UTC

1