WHY did I View Source? This is 2016: <TABLE id=Container height="100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0 UNSELECTABLE="on">

Oct 23, 2016 · 11:20 AM UTC

4
2
9
Then I don't think we're lost in translation Lee - that's exactly what I'm advocating to know yer semantics is to love them! @reactjs
1
Replying to @mholzschlag
Let's turn this into a soup of DIVs rendered with @reactjs!
1
2
Andreas, that's what people THINK @reactjs is for! I now believe most frameworks are only as good or bad as the devs using them @localheinz
3
Replying to @mholzschlag
you shouldn't look at things that hurt you. Best advice ever from my DH.
1
1
That would mean never viewing source, and it's kinda in my job description ;-)
1
1
Headers? Lists? C'mon - it's not that difficult. Really.
One element has no parent - ONE! Even then, with var; at-rules; #CSS universal selector and imagination? #Think! @asbig @reactjs @localheinz
Which part is lost @asbig? Can you go word for word and tell me where I became unclear? This is helpful to break down. @reactjs @localheinz
Replying to @mholzschlag
Enjoy your afternoon and day, Ms. Molly! Good golly!
1
1