My issues with @w3c and my belief that it's fallen far off mission is mine alone. I don't want you to agree. I'd prefer to be wrong in this.

Jul 2, 2016 · 2:08 PM UTC

3
1
3
usually the user makes their own choice about how & where they get content.
1
I'm rather concerned that people think this issue is about watching netflix and piracy. It's about USER rights.
2
Gee @TinaHolmboe, sorry you feel this way. I had same Qs as @amyw3c. We are sincere; not angry. @mholzschlag @w3c
1
PS. Thanks for trying to answer. Sorry we don't understand. @amyw3c @mholzschlag @w3c
1
software doesn't have to enforce hardware DRM. DRM may restrict fair use remix/forking/access
I did. I still see no reason for @w3c kowtowing to proprietary content providers. ActiveX debarcle redux..
how does @w3c benefit from #eme ? Not against content, against commercial interests dictating vendor lock in / lockout
have Flash & silverlight really made things better? Unsure. Exploit vectors in Flash for instance
DRM interop opens up major attack/failure vector. secureROM, SafeDisc & uPlay as examples a
so maybe @Netflix should have saner contract terms that meet its consumer needs?
1