Here now is my ethical question: If you are told about a crime through back-channel discourse and it could be a falsehood, what do you do?

Jun 11, 2016 · 11:04 PM UTC

5
1
3
Replying to @ColdWarDefector @AllenJS @meyerweb
I agree. And is also is where any corrective action will grind to a halt, unfortunately. Until the next victim.
Replying to @ColdWarDefector @AllenJS
Any specific actions you've found to be effective in mitigating such risk? @meyerweb
Replying to @ColdWarDefector @AllenJS
That's the difficult call. Bad info at that point might lead to innocents unfairly being denied otherwise equal opportunity.
1
Replying to @ColdWarDefector @AllenJS
Verification of the back-channel seems daunting. Multiple complaints I could justify. But 1? Or even several? People take sides. :/
1
Replying to @ColdWarDefector @AllenJS
That's a pretty interesting viewpoint. A little edgy there but I guess necessary under such circumstances. I find it all very sad.
1
Replying to @ColdWarDefector @AllenJS
Surely we all have our bad times. My own situation with drinking and depression - I wouldn't have hired me then. But now I would.
Replying to @ColdWarDefector @AllenJS
Do you think that there's a need for tracking this sort of thing? Such as sharing the information with other event managers?
Replying to @ColdWarDefector @AllenJS
From a corporate risk management POV would this be the guideline: Decline anyone accused of risky behavior involving others?
Replying to @ColdWarDefector @AllenJS
This has been really helpful. Thank you for the perspective :)
1
Replying to @mholzschlag
I have struggled with this question more than once. No easy answers nor clear paths.
2
3
It's a terrible weight. No easy answers indeed.
1
1
more replies
Load more