I think we need to re-examine what "#OpenWeb" really is - it does NOT mean "Free" nor is it the SAME as "Open Source" - commonalities, yes.

May 22, 2016 路 6:26 PM UTC

1
2
2
Replying to @mholzschlag
or perhaps "accessible" ?
1
1
Accessibility is fundamentally about equal access, @gripusa. I see access as an inherently necessary part of all forms of human expression.
4
2
Browsers MUST implement open specs IMO. Feature sets can be the competitive area. I often use car safety specs as an allegory.
1
In the ideal, I agree with you. I remain deeply divided and upset at what happened at M.I.T in March between @W3C @EFF & @FSF.
1
more replies
In March, The @EFF and @FSF protested @W3C over #ETE. I happened to be on site and it disrupted a lot of my perspectives.
I was on site for W3C as staff. After more than ~ 12 years in WG's, in part why I decided a staff role is not for me and left.
DRM cannot be part of any open specification. A control in place based on economic advantage? Straight up antithesis of Open. @AaronToponce
6
5
What was that again, Zen of CSS wha? LOL - I don't disagree we need to fight. I also think we have no real leadership anymore.
I think if I sign it, it goes down in value for being "marred" but sure ;-)