earlier replies
Replying to @mholzschlag
@mollydotcom not trying to be - seems in a world where billions things agree on meaning of code + SDOs, "there are none" needs explaining.
1
@briankardell Which standards do you follow?
1
@mollydotcom I'm involved in a number of them as were you, which is why I'm confused/say I need more in order to understand the comment.
3
@mollydotcom is my question really difficult to understand?
1
@briankardell Is mine? "Web Standards" is a marketing term, Brian. Specifically to help express to non-professionals some idea of quality.
2
@mollydotcom trying to figure out how to make this non-circular in nature, language is complex. Standards are agreement-between who matters
3
@briankardell Some standards carry the force of law. E.g. osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp… Maybe that’s what @mollydotcom means by a “true standard"
2
1
@briankardell @mollydotcom then there’s these: standards.ieee.org/findstds/…
1
2
@chriseppstein @briankardell Chris has it. And Brian you don't know me for very long. I've been incessant on these issues for decades now.
2
@mollydotcom perhaps, but I have followed your stuff for some time - is there a piece of some kind that sums up? Link? @chriseppstein
1
Replying to @briankardell
@briankardell @chriseppstein Brian, did I not talk your freakin' ear off about the need for a "common gloss" and my desire to address that?

Nov 30, 2015 · 10:43 PM UTC

2
@briankardell @chriseppstein No common semantics isn't helpful across domains. We desperately need an agreed upon set of human semantics.
Replying to @mholzschlag
@mollydotcom it was a nice talk - I still have both my ears, but yes you did :) @chriseppstein
1