You KNOW it's gonna suck for me the day I die. I'm gonna be in that deathbed yelling 'THERE ARE STILL NO STANDARDS' and shaking frail fists.
1
5
@mollydotcom would like to understand how are there no standards well before that day plz :) you have my email/skype/dm and so on...
1
2
@briankardell You're a semanticist. Tell me the meaning of "standards" please.
1
@mollydotcom not trying to be - seems in a world where billions things agree on meaning of code + SDOs, "there are none" needs explaining.
1
@briankardell Which standards do you follow?
1
@mollydotcom I'm involved in a number of them as were you, which is why I'm confused/say I need more in order to understand the comment.
3
@mollydotcom is my question really difficult to understand?
1
@briankardell Is mine? "Web Standards" is a marketing term, Brian. Specifically to help express to non-professionals some idea of quality.
2
@mollydotcom trying to figure out how to make this non-circular in nature, language is complex. Standards are agreement-between who matters
3
Replying to @briankardell
@briankardell Standards have existed long before Web. Web standards shouldn't ever really be like tech standards lest we obfuscate "open."

Nov 30, 2015 路 10:00 PM UTC

1
Replying to @mholzschlag
@mollydotcom I explain this in the talk that I shared actually... And frequently "standards" fail to become "standard"
2
1
@briankardell I don't want ISO or e3 or EMCA in my W3C recommendations (lookin' at you WCAG 2). It's what keeps the core Web free and open.
1