To recap: 1. Internet platforms use hands-off approach to regulating speech 2. Hate speech thrives 3. Mass killing plans get egged on online
10
127
153
I’m all for taking a carefully considered, non-kneejerk approach to curbing speech, but it’s been years. How many lives could’ve been saved?
4
15
17
Replying to @KuraFire
@KuraFire Censorship is not an answer, we've been there, done that, and lives are lost because of it too. We need to rewrite the platform.

Oct 1, 2015 · 10:07 PM UTC

2
1
Replying to @mholzschlag
@mollydotcom What I’m suggesting isn’t censorship, but rather just enforcing the standards we keep to offline, to also apply online.
2
Replying to @mholzschlag
@mollydotcom If someone in a crowd says they’re going to shoot the person next to them, we don’t have the crowd go “Yeah, do it!” after all.
2
1
@KuraFire It's a human problem which means in order to find solutions we humans have to change our behavior and thinking. That's SO easy ;-)
2