@mollydotcom ...but almost all have weighed it and taken the other route, for a number of solid reasons.
1
We've come to an interesting crossroads I think, @ericlaw - where security and policy are in conflict. Neither of us is wrong. What's right?
2
@ericlaw I never said chrome was enforcing censorship. I said it was blocking the Open Web. I stand by my statement and I have no influence.
1
2
@mollydotcom In your FB post, you say warning is "Google is [...] not allowing YOU to participate in what MIGHT BE illegal file sharing."
2
@ericlaw I realize my feelings are even stronger about this than I thought. Yes. I am questioning Google's motives. You are right.
2
@mollydotcom ...then I think your central argument should be usnews.com/news/articles/201…, rather than misrepresenting what Safe Browsing is.
1
@mollydotcom I actually like the chrome safe browsing implementation. Too many outdated Wordpress sites get hacked without owners knowledge
1
1
@kenhowardpdx Safe browsing is fine. Open Web suggests it be a) less obtrusive than a full page block and b) OFF by default rather than on.
2
1
@mollydotcom @kenhowardpdx BTW, which default do you think is going to result in *many* fewer infected computers?
1
Safe browsing utilities are undeniably mission-critical. I advocate USER DEFINED. #ux please meet #security / @nerdworldorder @kenhowardpdx
Jul 12, 2015 · 11:05 PM UTC
1
1
1