@mollydotcom In the SmartScreen case, the default is that kids' accounts cannot bypass the warnings.
1
@mollydotcom You could argue, as some do, that browsers shouldn't allow click-through to known malicious sites...
1
1
@mollydotcom ...but almost all have weighed it and taken the other route, for a number of solid reasons.
1
We've come to an interesting crossroads I think, @ericlaw - where security and policy are in conflict. Neither of us is wrong. What's right?
2
@ericlaw I never said chrome was enforcing censorship. I said it was blocking the Open Web. I stand by my statement and I have no influence.
1
2
@mollydotcom In your FB post, you say warning is "Google is [...] not allowing YOU to participate in what MIGHT BE illegal file sharing."
2
@ericlaw I realize my feelings are even stronger about this than I thought. Yes. I am questioning Google's motives. You are right.
2
@mollydotcom is not only outspoken in this matter, she is completely correct @ericlaw
2
@mollydotcom @ericlaw In the browser industry we've always tended to ignore the 'extras' that get tacked onto the chrome. Just see Netscape
1
@mollydotcom @ericlaw It's in that last piece of UI chrome that the browser vendor exerts influence & control, and I agree this goes too far
1
1
Jul 12, 2015 路 9:59 PM UTC