@ericlaw Since when is a copyright anyone's business but the holder? There's a system in place for that. It's called "get a lawyer."
1
@mollydotcom My point is you're confused. The site is blocked because it infects visitors PCs.
2
1
@ericlaw Protecting me from malware as IT DEFINES IT isn't Google's job. Malware, viruses, bad acts must be judged in the court of the land.
1
@mollydotcom If you don't want malware blocking, turn off Safe Browsing.
2
I'm kinda slow @ericlaw so work with me a little to explain how a soft block is remotely preventative of malware or improved security?
1
@mollydotcom In the same way that "CAUTION" tape helps prevent people from falling down open manholes.
2
@mollydotcom In the SmartScreen case, the default is that kids' accounts cannot bypass the warnings.
1
@mollydotcom You could argue, as some do, that browsers shouldn't allow click-through to known malicious sites...
1
1
@mollydotcom ...but almost all have weighed it and taken the other route, for a number of solid reasons.
1
We've come to an interesting crossroads I think, @ericlaw - where security and policy are in conflict. Neither of us is wrong. What's right?
2
@ericlaw I never said chrome was enforcing censorship. I said it was blocking the Open Web. I stand by my statement and I have no influence.
Jul 12, 2015 路 8:43 PM UTC
1
2