nitter
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2012
TwitterPoll: Is it appropriate for us to edit wiki-based historic/biographic that is incorrect or missing our significant contributions?
Oct 27, 2012 · 11:20 PM UTC
8
John Foliot
@johnfoliot
27 Oct 2012
Replying to
@mholzschlag
@mollydotcom
isn't that the whole point of wiki?
1
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2012
@johnfoliot
Yeah, but editing information about oneself feels icky to me.
1
more replies
α eridans - iQ CIO
@Eridanus
28 Oct 2012
Replying to
@mholzschlag
@mollydotcom
I'd find it OK if you mentioned errors & omissions to a good but critical friend whom you can trust to edit as appropriate.
Terence Tuhinanshu
@rajadain
27 Oct 2012
Replying to
@mholzschlag
@mollydotcom
If the goal is to have correct info there, then it doesn't matter who puts it in. Sometimes anecdotes trump citations.
Joe O’Connor
@AccessibleJoe
27 Oct 2012
Replying to
@mholzschlag
@mollydotcom
Only if you log in as "a different girl" if you know what I mean.
Arlen Walker
@Arlen
28 Oct 2012
Replying to
@mholzschlag
@mollydotcom
so long as you're willing to be challenged for supporting citations. They did that when Harlan Ellison corrected his bio.
Jordan
@jordangray
28 Oct 2012
Replying to
@mholzschlag
@mollydotcom
(And yeah, your Wikipedia page needs some love; I corrected it years back, but didn't have the energy to fix it properly! :( )
Nick Fitzsimons
@NickFitz
27 Oct 2012
Replying to
@mholzschlag
@mollydotcom
The Wikipedians frown upon self-editing. Then again, many of them are twats.
Frank Jonen
@frankjonen
27 Oct 2012
Replying to
@mholzschlag
@mollydotcom
common sensical, yes. Wikisensical, no.