Why I'm snarky about #AI hype of late 1. Artifice is of humans. So what's is intelligence and how is it qualified or quantified. Called smart a lot, I'm truly impossibly stupid far more often. 2. Seems limited to short term personal gain over long term human growth and unity.
3
1
11
I’ve been playing with these AI “tools” And I use that term loosely. Regarding ChatGPT: There’s just an element of randomness and then spewing back material from a large database, but if you look at it from a critical viewpoint, The underlying substance is garbage.
3
1
I'm not impressed at all and I don't think it's intelligent if one could measure that. The art sometimes has been interesting but only so much the writing horrifies me both from prompt and the idea that it can be used in place of education is just appalling
1
1
The most I can say about it is that, if I feed a text that I wrote it is sort of helpful in reducing it to plain language (plain language is a problem for me). But even then I can’t use it as it provides. ChatGPT absolutely does not have any form of discriminating intelligence.
2
1
Replying to @MyndexResearch
And the critical analysis is where that's an important part of what I consider intelligence anyway and if you can't do critical thinking it's pure bias

Mar 20, 2023 · 10:14 AM UTC

1
1
Replying to @mholzschlag
There’s a gigantic problem that is going to undoubtedly have serious implications in the future. In a series of recent tests I discovered that chat GPT has an atrocious confirmation bias. Worse than a moron sitting on top of “Mount stupid” of the Dunning Kruger curve
1
1
Again reflection of humanity right there
1
1
more replies