His ideas have Merit but I don't know that they are sustainable and we have to think a lot more about this as he is doing and as are others. Putting content control back into our hands and securing our layers of the World Wide Web are if you'll forgive the pun truly solid ideas.

The much more difficult thing to fix and where I believe the darkest of problems that is in the mix now is the social media and social network models. We want connection to family and friends and colleagues. Here I am despite concern because of exactly the social relationships.

But there are very serious problems with social networks and the first begins the moment we click a terms of service agreement. Have people really read those? They are written in boring long legalese so we tend not to. We go right for the check box without Clarity of terms.

When a social network terms of service has agreed to typically speaking our content is no longer ours but belongs to the network. Freedom of speech? If you've ever been in Facebook or Twitter jail you know it doesn't exist on those platforms. But it gets much darker.

Social media Networks have been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to involve themselves in manipulation of the masses through targeted or subversive advertising. There are Bots spreading misinformation as well as humans. The separatism via binary arguments cause harm even death.

So who is responsible for that on social networks well the first and foremost goal of a social media company is profiteering. They want to make money and it is not the domain of freedom or open or multi-stakeholder in fact the opposite. Single or small stakeholder models.

Well Zuckerberg and others have been need to testify by government the problem is often that governments do not have the technical understanding or the desire to stop special interest groups from manipulating the money for the benefit of corporate government and private factions.

Did we ask for this no we did not as people but we accepted it when we checked that terms of service and we accept it because we stay and I myself don't want to go not because I have jakt to the model because I reject this model but I don't want to lose my connection to you.

So what do we do? It's not exactly easy to reject the reality that social networking has become a part of our very existence. Children and adults now care more about social networks in riding a bike or being in nature or spending non-online time with F2F friends and family.

It is social media networks that I personally point the finger to as being the most problematic and separated from internet and web ideals because they are in fact walled Gardens. If Government, predatory capitalism, special interest groups will not change these things who will?