I mean, is he admitting that he’s spending $40 billion to “own the libs”? Because if so, I don’t think it’s the libs who are getting owned here…
Whoever thought owning the libs would be cheap never tried to acquire a social media company!
40
180
5
1,267
Replying to @RVAwonk @jr_roman
As a lexical semanticist one could easily demonstrate the meaning of libs in that context as meaning slave. Just saying.

May 14, 2022 · 8:53 PM UTC

1