The past few days I've posted a lot about my passionate antipathy with the no code approach, the belief that HTML and CSS are not important to learn in favor of JavaScript, HTML5 /APIs, and my ongoing pain that we disregard accessibility. Some understand why but most do not.
1
1
17
One of the reasons that people do not understand my position is because they think I'm a web 10 developer and it doesn't make sense to me. Inaccurate. I'm not a developer designer or programmer. I come from a background of language, linguistics, semantics, meaning, Behavior.
1
2
When I started in Information Technology that's when the computation part became very important to me as did retaking mathematics from simple to Advanced and studying computational linguistics and now computational Neuroscience. I have long and deep experience in our field.
1
1
1
I want to passionately Proclaim that I feel the no code and you don't have to learn languages or have an education in a wide variety of influential topics as well as an understanding of internet and web protocols and languages as well as the history of our field is very harmful.
1
4
My influences when it comes to mentors and great thinkers in our industry remain an unexpected delight in my life. But it did not include the computer scientist, and Stanford professor emeritus Donald Knuth who met Tim Berners-Lee and others once at a pre w3c conference. Crazy!
1
Professor Knuth has some wonderful and easy to understand I'm going to post a compelling short video relevance to conversations this week in the next post. He has interviews with my personal favorite podcaster @lexfridman and others as well. I'm very interested in your responses.
1
1
This video from Dr. Donald Knuth "HTML IS a Programming Language" is provocative, witty, arguable and even he shows where and why! to have discovered his work now is an utter joy for me. I hope it will be for you as well. 😊 youtube.com/4A2mWqLUpzw#100Days… #HTML #webdevelopers #NoCode

May 2, 2022 · 3:29 AM UTC

14
4
2
17
Replying to @mholzschlag
I've always believed that HTML and CSS are programming languages. They don't necessarily have the logic and control structures of a programming language, but they do have their own semantics.
1
1
Interesting pov. They are together in css3 considered Turing complete they are declarative but they don't really do still all the description of programming languages per se. It's remains contentious because it's interpreted.
1
Replying to @mholzschlag
Love the video and the discussion. Thanks!
1
1
But wait there's more he is really interesting I am so glad you enjoyed him I found him delightful and incredibly enriching.
1
1
Replying to @mholzschlag
HTML is best understood considering it was originally a concrete subset of what became SGML doctypes developed at CERN in the early-mid 1980s. The tag names were even well known by early users of IBM's GML GDOC Starter Set (:p., :h1., :dl. etc.) that informed on CERN's work.
1
1
Actually that's not true the history says otherwise
Replying to @mholzschlag
These concrete vocabularies based on GML parser declarations (DTDs) were used in principle like Job Control Languages, thus having features like symbol replacement, attributes that affected renditions, and even other JCL for running the build interpreter (SCRIPT).
1
Yeah but this is pretty w3c and free specification and pre document type definition for HTML or the tag set really that Tim proposed of which I am speaking prior to 1994
Replying to @mholzschlag
So I agree with Knuth, other than further refining the functional role as a JCL. But that is all pedantic. Descriptive markup exists primarily to describe "what it is" rather than "what it looks like," and this set even lowly HTML apart from word processors of the day.
1
Maybe you didn't listen to the next installment where he clarifies what he really means I'm going to post it now