CSS WG level 4 and 5 module changes due to misuse of !important with layer which while not illogical as a solution to external frameworks causing language fragmentation and rushing solutions instead of collaborative, evolving WG specs is reactionary, not innovative. Bothers me.

Do you really believe that CSS was given this cultural connotation or if it was Tailwind it's self. Sure the w3c hasn't had a huge number of technical females working in the CSS working group but more and more as time went on including me and I was never given that s*** not once

Specifically Catholic and yes homophobic sad to say but not unintelligent. As for whether misogyny is clear or unclear if it is presented in front of me I do not consider it a separate problem than any other exclusion and in fact it is my definition of disability.