CSS WG level 4 and 5 module changes due to misuse of !important with layer which while not illogical as a solution to external frameworks causing language fragmentation and rushing solutions instead of collaborative, evolving WG specs is reactionary, not innovative. Bothers me.
1
8
Do you really believe that CSS was given this cultural connotation or if it was Tailwind it's self. Sure the w3c hasn't had a huge number of technical females working in the CSS working group but more and more as time went on including me and I was never given that s*** not once
1
1
Replying to @nachtfunke @jen4web
I'm sorry were you talking about somebody I should be listening to LOL because I'm not you yes you're making good points and teaching me something and that I appreciate but that kind of toxicity at any point in my life I will rather die and I mean that

Apr 25, 2022 · 12:20 PM UTC

1
This tweet is unavailable
As I said we always have the opportunity to walk away there is no money no paycheck nothing on this Earth for me at least I do understand other people have different issues. I'm informed now. I don't need to give it air time. I'd rather talk Tech with you peacefully :-)
2