CSS WG level 4 and 5 module changes due to misuse of !important with layer which while not illogical as a solution to external frameworks causing language fragmentation and rushing solutions instead of collaborative, evolving WG specs is reactionary, not innovative. Bothers me.
1
8
Do you really believe that CSS was given this cultural connotation or if it was Tailwind it's self. Sure the w3c hasn't had a huge number of technical females working in the CSS working group but more and more as time went on including me and I was never given that s*** not once
1
1
Replying to @nachtfunke @jen4web
Yes the issues are important I don't want to talk human identifiers other than inclusion not exclusion. Conversations about human identity and identifiers are to me the reason they persist. Whether money or my very life I will not participate in a hateful, oppressive workplace.

Apr 25, 2022 · 12:18 PM UTC