CSS WG level 4 and 5 module changes due to misuse of !important with layer which while not illogical as a solution to external frameworks causing language fragmentation and rushing solutions instead of collaborative, evolving WG specs is reactionary, not innovative. Bothers me.
1
8
I do have to admit I'm still struggling with the terminology no code. Could you describe it a little more to me as to what that may have emerged from and why?
1
So I got to thinking if I were to do something similar for the 100 days of code challenge and would immediately came to mind was history of markup and why it is important to have yes code. There are also binary arguments about what is code, what is language, what is programming.
1
I'm doing my first irl keynote in a decade May 9th in Austin @knowbility #ACCESSU. I'm also working on a book with the same title as the Keynote. Not sure if I told you about this or if you read anything about it I've also done some recent podcasts.
1
I'm getting Symantec on its ass that's what I'm doing LOL. Accessibility is availability. We have accessibility tacked onto the tail end. If a site and site content is unavailable for any reason from government control to human conditions to digital divide Etc it's not accessible
1
1
Replying to @mholzschlag @jen4web @knowbility
If something is in available to us we can't have an experience with it. This places accessibility as the on-ramp to all web content for all interferences. This place is accessibility first and foremost before any other technique or ideology.

Apr 24, 2022 · 1:29 PM UTC

4
1
Replying to @mholzschlag @jen4web @knowbility
I'm getting semantic on its ass is what I meant. perfect example Voice to Text input is failing me. To be literate I have to go in and manually make edits. Using my hands to do that is causing more contracture issues. Google Voice is not only an accessible it's harmful.
1
Replying to @mholzschlag @jen4web @knowbility
I also expand the ideology to look at all sense-perception beyond what we understand to be our five senses and creating input-output methodologies for all of them which expand opportunities beyond what people term a disability. Everybody is disabled in some way.
1
Replying to @mholzschlag @jen4web @knowbility
The book does have code but it's not about the practice of accessibility as a science and art. We have those resources. Human beings do not classify inclusively rather exclusively. I cover cognitive bias I cover how those things can be course corrected if we choose to do so.
1
Replying to @mholzschlag @jen4web @knowbility
It's all that and more. I also realizing that I think we shouldn't be even using the words accessibility and disability but I have a problem with language censorship so I won't be beating that horse too hard. Teaching clients is not working. Let's talk quality assurance
1
more replies