CSS WG level 4 and 5 module changes due to misuse of !important with layer which while not illogical as a solution to external frameworks causing language fragmentation and rushing solutions instead of collaborative, evolving WG specs is reactionary, not innovative. Bothers me.
1
8
I do have to admit I'm still struggling with the terminology no code. Could you describe it a little more to me as to what that may have emerged from and why?
1
That's all very clear now to me as to why no code makes no sense. It really is a terrible misnomer and it makes sense also that it would have come from marketing because they're experts at misnomers. I've been really impressed with the content course correction you've been doing.
1
Replying to @jen4web
So I think some backgrounds and understanding of HTML xhtml HTML5 and what the term semantics really means as opposed to the way we use it might help people understand why HTML is in fact something necessary and needed to understand.

Apr 24, 2022 · 12:29 PM UTC
1
This tweet is unavailable
That's a great dovetail into my earlier question about how many tags existed in the pre w3c markup that Tim used on NeXT at CERN. Pretty funny stuff and very Illuminating and relevant to the difference in meaning between what is a programming language and what is a human language
1