CSS WG level 4 and 5 module changes due to misuse of !important with layer which while not illogical as a solution to external frameworks causing language fragmentation and rushing solutions instead of collaborative, evolving WG specs is reactionary, not innovative. Bothers me.
1
8
I do have to admit I'm still struggling with the terminology no code. Could you describe it a little more to me as to what that may have emerged from and why?
1
That's all very clear now to me as to why no code makes no sense. It really is a terrible misnomer and it makes sense also that it would have come from marketing because they're experts at misnomers. I've been really impressed with the content course correction you've been doing.
1
Replying to @jen4web
I'm coming to a very different idea about the web right now. I do not think that the way we are developing applications has anything to do with the web. They are in fact applications and they don't necessarily require a browser for executing or interpreting the language combos.

Apr 24, 2022 · 12:28 PM UTC
1
This tweet is unavailable
You nailed it. Actually Liam Quinn made a great quote that also nailed it on Facebook. "apps are for today and maybe tomorrow, but documents are forever." I'm going to be spreading that like melted butter
1