CSS WG level 4 and 5 module changes due to misuse of !important with layer which while not illogical as a solution to external frameworks causing language fragmentation and rushing solutions instead of collaborative, evolving WG specs is reactionary, not innovative. Bothers me.
1
8
I do have to admit I'm still struggling with the terminology no code. Could you describe it a little more to me as to what that may have emerged from and why?
1
Replying to @jen4web
That's all very clear now to me as to why no code makes no sense. It really is a terrible misnomer and it makes sense also that it would have come from marketing because they're experts at misnomers. I've been really impressed with the content course correction you've been doing.

Apr 24, 2022 · 12:03 PM UTC
1
This tweet is unavailable
So I had a lot of thoughts about backgrounds 2 language history and the composition of the languages we use, the separation perspective brought together as a singular entity and how it hitched ml5 didn't kill / but it is definitely killing the idea of a website in favor of apps.
1