There are so many ways that *we* erect barriers and create disability.
Accessibility first. If we cannot access a reference freely available due to location, language, belief, government limitations, literacy, economy and digital divide? That which is between us and that reference is what disables inclusion and fosters exclusion. That is disability.
1
5
Accessibility is far bigger than the science and practice of making a website compliant to a law or a condition we believe to be human when all humans are conditional. The web, its sites much less applications are useless to anyone who can't get to them even with the best #a11y
2
4
I could not agree more.
1
1
As a thought argument it would be fun to debate whether it's really true that the web is a necessity if it is for whom? Maslow's laws of basic need yeah necessary but the web? Not even. 3.5 billion of 7. 9 billion humans are not online. At all. It isn't a need. Is it a benefit?
3
1
The moment that some government transactions can only be done from the web. In that moment, if someone is offline they're off the society.
2
2
Also excellent points and still not need what we are doing in that instance is shutting out people who are already accessing web. For anyone, esp. government to offer one access means to a service is foolish. When the need is greater than access that system fails. Great example.

Mar 1, 2022 · 1:08 AM UTC

1