Holding two contradictory ideas in tandem is the mark of advanced cognition. As long as there is a top and a bottom, there will be those who lunge for the top, those flee from the bottom, and a rare few who strive to stabilize all together.
Follow your polestar, and lead.
2
2
I also think that that cognitive dissonance you're describing is actually black and white thinking. By only making a top and a bottom you're not allowing for the diversity of what comes in between which is a lot more than just the middle wouldn't you say?
1
Oh, not cognitive dissonance at all! Linear is a legit model. As are spatial models, booleans, and networks. Nature made apex predators, not my little accident of a mind. You can argue (and I'd agree) that the model is off, that using pyramids or endpoints is inadequate.
2
1
I have to muse on that. I fall into what I refer to aas 'rabbinical reactionary syndrome (rrs)' as I call it when subjects I wallow in and am writing about get tossed at me from smart kids in the room. As you just did ;-)
Jun 16, 2021 · 11:31 PM UTC
1
1

