Gunnar, you never fail to do the unusual ;-) XHTML 1.0 but served as HTML I'll bet? 😇
I’ve built a frameset 2 days ago: bittersmann.de/cssbattle/col…
XHTML 1.0 Frameset, of course. 🤣
1
3
Sad, since who knows what could have come about with XML apps (sez me who stayed in HTML WG 'til charter lost pre XHTML 2.0)! But, people have managed it. Pain, yes. But your command of your toolbox is unique and long-lasting. R.E.S.P.E.C.T. my friend!
1
1
Yea, it’s sad that @Hixie & Co. never understood the merits of XML.
2
2
Today’s a good day to translate this tweet of mine nitter.vloup.ch/g16n/status/1035…
“XML is silly, namespaces are silly, XHTML is silly, HTML5 is cool.”
Some time later: “We need scope! How about prefixes?”
#facepalm
„XML ist doof, Namensräume sind doof, XHTML ist doof, HTML5 ist cool.“
Einige Zeit später: „Wir brauchen Scope! Wie wär’s mit Präfixen?“
#Gesichtspalme
2
1
2
#WebComponents: bring back #XML w/ dashes & w/o namespaces, invent shadow DOM instead of #XSLT support in browsers. 20 yrs, no real progress
2
1
2
Screw functional programming for real web documents and large-scale sites for research and edu and agencies with very specific terms they do it in medical here all the real vision of human readable accessible code. I miss declarative. The design principles of either are clear!
Feb 25, 2021 · 12:34 AM UTC
1