.@naval: The original internet protocols (e.g. HTTP) were stateless. So then private companies like Facebook started to store state and identity. But now they own and have data lock-in. Bitcoin is now the first *stateful* protocol. The data is all public and open to anyone.
4
47
3
334
.@naval explains this tweet: nitter.vloup.ch/naval/status/134โ€ฆ In the future, there will be one canonical social protocol with all the social data. The future YouTubes, Clubhouses, and Twitters will all be built on the winning social protocol. (We don't know yet which one will win.)
Ultimately, there will only be one Social Protocol.
6
40
7
266
.@naval: I want to be totally platform-independent. If Twitter goes away, if Twitter deplatforms me, or if someone else deplatforms Twitter, I don't want to lose my followers or profile.
3
33
7
346
.@naval: Instead of following me on Twitter, you'll follow a pointer to me on the blockchain. If Twitter deplatforms me, I'll update the pointer to my new location on the blockchain.
12
79
10
536
.@naval: The other advantage of decentralized social networks is payments built-in. Right now, YouTube takes much more of the value created by users of the platform then they deserve.
10
41
5
328
.@naval: Decentralized social media will also be programmable. No more being limited by the one client made by the single company. In the future, there will be 100s of clients all competing with each other, all using the same underlying decentralized social protocol.
6
40
8
338
.@naval: The future decentralized social protocol will create trillions of dollars in value, but it won't all go to a few companies in the Bay Area. It'll be distributed across all the users of the platform.
10
52
5
445
.@naval: Decentralized social media is what I want to spend the next significant years of my professional career working on. Don't want to be a serf on Jack's or Zuck's farm.
40
140
27
1,196
i like *fans* ๐Ÿค— better than users ๐Ÿฅต
1
1
I hate hate hate the term user. I have succumbed to #UX in this regard, but a user is to me a derogatory comment in the sense of "that person really uses people for their own gain." Fan is better but fans can be shallow. One idea might be "friends" or "folks" - general. Words!

Jan 25, 2021 ยท 8:21 AM UTC

1