Long tweet ahead. I'll post to FB for continuity. Because it's a story about how and why we humans get stuck. Last week @Wikipedia sent two begs for money from me at different addresses. My parents were different classes. Mom climbed the Ivory Tower. Dad died alone in an SRO.
1
2
2020 was a year of corporate, policy and political begging often from people who are not well off or outright homeless (twice for me since 2016). @Wikipedia and its editors, had they done diligence, could have helped with a more explicit, fair, accurate accounting of my life.
1
1
Some time back I'd read @marccanter4real's bio and was struck at the amount of detail (often very wrong I've learned) but that was never held to rigorous "journalistic" standards. It's not news @Wikimedia editors have different documentation often based on race, class, gender etc
1
1
In a fit of anger against what I believed to be unethical and unequal I used @marccanter4real bio to show the detail with far less oversight. Marc's response bothered me because he showed me how wrong my assumption was via poor or no documentation around the #MeToo movement.
1
1
While I will never deny any human their trauma, pain, violation I worry when our human traumas make a focal point of individuals without due process. Yes, shame to blame can work. I try to keep it org/corporate not people alone. But I miss that mark at times as can we all.
1
1
The person who did not miss the Mark was @marccanter4real because he and I talked beyond that moment of bias and came to a different understanding of the exchange. He also saw the literary device and allegorical use of both of us as being failed by @Wikimedia along with THOUSANDS
1
2
Thousands. @Wikipedia @Wikimedia would NOT EXIST TO BEG MONEY FROM anyone had we thousands of humans who built the World Wide Web. I took a risk. I'm better for it. And Marc proved civil discourse is alive and well without FUD spread by a good idea went oh so wrong oh so badly.

Nov 14, 2020 · 12:18 AM UTC

1
2
here here thank you all I ever ask 4 is truth unfortunately there really isn't such a thing as the "Wikimedia" editors. Its pure anarchy. Anyone can be an editor. They can say (& they do) anything they wish - amplifying lies, legends or facts - based upon the time of day
1
1
The thanks is mutual and it is anarchy. In my case, Web Review, Web Techniques, CMP, US Congressional Recognition, Arizona, Fast Company top woman innovator, WaSP, Bill Gates and me TWICE. My education? HA! Instead, I was asked for PICTURES of me (no selfies) as "they work best".
1