nitter
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
It is the true teacher who leaves the class knowing they have learned the most.
Tucson, AZ
Joined September 2006
Tweets
64,757
Following
13,801
Followers
26,057
Likes
36,165
Tweets
Tweets & Replies
Media
Search
Filter
Retweets
Media
Videos
News
Verified
Native videos
Replies
Links
Images
Safe
Quotes
Pro videos
Exclude
Retweets
Media
Videos
News
Verified
Native videos
Replies
Links
Images
Safe
Quotes
Pro videos
Time range
-
Near
Load newest
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Off to the office. I like pretending to be a grownup. :: giggle ::
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Replying to
@theDayrooth
@jdagerot this state of the mobile web report contains handset and unique user stats by world regions: http://www.opera.com/smw/2009/09/
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
State of the Mobile Web
@opera
: http://www.opera.com/smw/2009/09/ just in case you've ever wondered about our staying power ;)
1
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Mols' HTML5 opinion: Semantics are interesting, but syntax is a mess. Web Forms 2.0 is genius and intuitive. HTML5 APIs are very powerful.
2
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
So to answer
@herko
's question, if you're serving XML properly whether it's in an HTML5 serialization or XML one, MIME TYPEs are the issue.
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
I hate the term "XHTML5" which is just a simple way of saying "XML serialization of HTML5 - must be served as application/xml"
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Replying to
@nzlemming
@nzlemming
I grew up (a little) and got a real job, so sometimes I have to act like I have one. AmStillYourMols
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
for
@kegill
and others interested in resources for HTML5, this is a nice list: http://is.gd/4DQBS - just remember, it's a spec in motion.
7
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Big difference IMO,
@herko
is XForms is meant to be integrated into XML languages. Web Forms 2 addresses application development in HTML.
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
I feel like a normal person. Having coffee and getting ready to go into the office. Should I be worried?
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Ha!
@yatil
:) Well, as you likely know, but others might not, no more work on XHTML 2 after the end of this year.
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Wondering if HTML5 Web Forms 2 (an aspect of HTML5 I really really like) is a far more intelligent means of handling forms than XForms.
1
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
XForms 1.1 is now a W3C rec. http://bit.ly/1inDaD - anyone working with XForms?
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Replying to
@firecatsue
@firecatsue
Heh. Well, that might take me some time, considering HTML5 is a moving target right now ;)
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Replying to
@judson
@JudsonCollier soon, soon. Patience is a virtue (so they say!)
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
For example: Use case: border-radius for rounded corners. Test case: border-radius applied to a given element, then tested in user agents.
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Use cases are demonstrations of how a given technology might best be used,
@ldexterldesign
. Test cases test aspects of a technology.
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Replying to
@ldexterldesign
@ldexterldesign
I haven't done much live site development in the past 2 years. I've done plenty of test and use cases. Different beasts.
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Replying to
@theDayrooth
@jdagerot I know we have that data re
@opera
but I'm not sure what's official for publication. As I'm in Oslo, I can find out & report back.
Molly E. Holzschlag
@mholzschlag
27 Oct 2009
Replying to
@akamike
@akamike
Good question! I don't have an answer yet. It might be different for others, depending upon how long they've worked with HTML/XHTML
Load more