It is the true teacher who leaves the class knowing they have learned the most.
Tucson, AZ
Joined September 2006
- Tweets 64,757
- Following 13,801
- Followers 26,057
- Likes 36,165
@KeriHenare Why is that even necessary in a non XML document? If you want to use XML notation you can, but yeah, must serve as XML.
@elpie Exactly. I like it when folks challenge the status quo, but I will almost always default to clean, semantic markup and CSS.
@KeriHenare No, you CAN close elements! You just can't use XML notation. <p>...</p> is fine.
@adactio I agree with that too. I'm not adamant it go in the spec. I am concerned that we promote best practices. That's all :D
@KeriHenare which do you mean re: Misinformation? Am confused, multiple conversations going on here!
@awoods no, I had /nothing/ to do with the W3C redesign. The people involved are acknowledged on the home page article.
@elpie @yatil @stubbornella's ideas are interesting. I don't agree with OOCSS at all, but I like that she's challenging the status quo.
Open Letter To WHAT-WG, http://bit.ly/1iShTW via @cgrymala. I agree we should keep to rigorous syntax in HTML5. It's pragmatic that way.
@fraying If I may be tongue-in-cheek, "Consider the Source" - your article was spot-on.
ooh, sorry. I meant @stubbornella's Object Oriented CSS. Typing too fast.
@dstorey Actually, I'd like to see TV implemented more too. But still :D
By the way, those odd class names on W3C site are from @stubornella's Object Oriented CSS - very controversial but interesting no less.
@oo00_Mr_K_00oo Are you sure about that? I seem to recall having had to pay a lot for a few of my dreams ;)
@dstorey Are you NEVER EVER satisfied child? My god. Give you screen, handheld and print and you want TV? You are the Geordie Jerry Seinfeld
"and it almost validates" @kevinmarks on W3C redesign. Classic.
1
@brucel I will happily agree with that, particularly in light of backward compatibility. So we agree, as usual ;)
@JudsonCollier As I said, long time coming. The wheels on the W3C go round and round, just very very slowly.
@brucel XML isn't the evil beast you seem to think it is. But I'm not gonna step in that with you now. Oh no.