'There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election' — Deputy Atty. General Rod Rosenstein
196
121
65
205
0
Replying to @MSNBC
Let's be clear: there's is no way to KNOW whether that conduct changed the election outcome, because there's no way to know who might have changed their mind because of it. And if 1 PER CENT of the FB ads placed by the Russians did change someone's mind, that changed the results.

Feb 16, 2018 · 6:41 PM UTC

20
6
1
47
I agree wholeheartedly. Very well said.
1
So you mean Hillary may not have then won the popular vote? Lmao..... keep spinning it! It’s great entertainment since ya all suck at journalism
Is she implying that those who watched her and others yell Colusion, colusion, collision are easily swayed by what others say...and can be led to believe that which they are told instead of researching themselves? Hmmmmmm
Yeah because we are all stupid and cannot make a decision on our own.
4
Stanford University did a study of battleground states and concluded that of those that saw any anti Hillary pro Trump ads it didn't charge there minds on who to vote for.
3
This leads nowhere. Every contact to RU, or to anyone influenced by RU, could be construed as meddling in an election. What's certain is that RU (and US) cyber ops will continue, unless some kind of cease-fire agreement is reached, meaning constructive dialog takes place.
that's right sweetie, keep telling yourself that...
But they said so, and you love the FBI and Mueller. You fucking liberals are insane
That is a lot of assumption....💁🏼‍♂️. What percent of exposed anti Hillary content did these ads make up, and what is their conversion rate?