It’s very one sided discussion. I used to think like you. Whenever I heard or read about an allegation, in my mind I was like he probably did it until the night I spent behind bars due to false allegation. I still get panic attacks.

I'm sorry that happened to you. That would be a terrible thing. There are many situations where I feel, "I don't know about this..." But these women's stories feel very credible to me.

The accused admitting it,DNA,video maybe a eye witness. Like I said I've been falsely accused. Just because someone says it doesn't make it so

I was attacked when I was 17. I'm either telling the truth or I'm not. I have no "evidence."

And Kevin Spacey's case, yes

They were 14 year old girls!

I never denigrated Monica Lewinsky - nor do I now - but I do think it's reasonable to point out that she wasn't 14 years old.

I think there's truth to that.

Why now though why not two years ago? That's the problem with the allegations and why people have to wonder if they are politically motivated. No form of sexual abuse is ok and if there is truth to it he needs to be tried by the law. If it's political he should keep fighting.

The girls were 14 and 16 years old, and he was a District Attorney. Who were they supposed to "report" it to? In what universe would they have been believed, much less their grievances redressed?