You’re right- only a tiny fraction of fgm is anywhere near as bad as mgm

Bad things are only bad if they happen to females.

Of course FGM and circumcision aren't the same. The only ones who would argue otherwise are psychologically damaged uncircumcised men who spend their days coping with their trauma and insecurity by fabricating lies about circumcised men and calling it 'activism'.

Tell me how removing a large part of functionality and nerves with zero medical need on any child is ok?

Stop shouting 'Not The Same" and tell us the difference.

By, "NOT the same!!!", I assume you are talking about the most extreme and rare form of FGM: infibulation. The most common forms of FGM involves cutting, altering, or removing the prepuce. Coincidentally, the most common forms of MGM ALSO cuts, alters, or removes the prepuce. 🤷🏼‍♀️

Care to explain this one? It's mutilation.

I agree, the case your talking about is over a "nick." and boys have over half of the skin removed from their genitals. One of these is clearly more damaging.

It is the same. They are both horrible. Leave people’s genitals alone. There is this thing called #bodyautonomy ..... 😠