Isn't something backwards when assault weapons are legal, but marijuana is not?

Aug 21, 2013 · 4:51 AM UTC

22
75
3
60
Replying to @DWilder
@BoudoirOnFilm If marijuana were legal, it would be MORE of a controlled substance...not less.
1
3
Replying to @DWilder
@BoudoirOnFilm Really? When was the last time marijuana was used to kill someone?
3
6
Replying to @DWilder
@BoudoirOnFilm Thanks. But neither is alcohol, nor cigarettes.
1
2
Replying to @DWilder
@BoudoirOnFilm Me neither. But I'd have someone stoned over someone with an assault weapon anytime.
2
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
@marwilliamson: Isn't something backwards when assault weapons are legal, but marijuana is not?” Amen !
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
@marwilliamson cray cray when their buddies start producing it, it will become legal. Until then weapons it is...
Replying to @marwilliamson
@marwilliamson It's another thing to get past & find it's not the boogieman it's been made out 2be e.g. booze, FM,records, cassettes, CDs,DL
Replying to @marwilliamson
RT “@marwilliamson: Isn't something backwards when assault weapons are legal, but marijuana is not?”
Replying to @marwilliamson
@marwilliamson But assault weapons are highly useful in armed robbery, where marijuana is not. Just kidding with you.