Replying to @marwilliamson
The only ones of these that are valid are 9-10. The others are just taking money from those who earn and giving it to those who don't.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Interesting, lofty goals. What’s the price tag for US citizens? Are you extending to 12 million non-citizens who live here illegally?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
These are all negative rights, meaning, someone must pay for them. Who pays? Who? Me? Constitutional right, eg freedom of speech, religion, bear arms, etc. are free. I’m not on board with your “rights”.
Replying to @marwilliamson
These are much better.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
This plan only exists with AI and Crypto infrastructure 💯
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
The more the govt has control, the less freedom for the people. The govt needs to be substantially trimmed, not enlarged. It’s much more efficient to run programs at the state level. The federal govt is an exclusive club that seeks money & power & could care less about people.
4
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
Ahhh yes, more socialism, that's the ticket. You wonder why nobody cares what you say?
2
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
This is good. But the problem with splitting the left vote is that the right wins. In every scenario. Do what you think is ethical.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
This would be great for some socialist experiment, but not for a nation that's trying to be free. Insisting that I have the right to someone else's property is about as un-American as it gets imo. No hard feelings, though - here's a beautiful bird for you. :)
1
4