Good.
A judge has ordered that Starbucks rehire a Colorado Starbucks worker who was illegally fired for organizing a union and issue back pay and write a letter of apology. cbsn.ws/41EGy03

Dec 28, 2023 · 3:17 PM UTC

17
78
1
622
Replying to @marwilliamson
Why is it good? Why does Starbucks need a union...can the employees not go anywhere else to work?
Replying to @marwilliamson
If you had to choose one of these four people to be the next President of the United States, who would you choose?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Why is this good?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
"Even if you're not represented by a union - even if you have zero interest in having a union - the National Labor Relations Act protects your right to band together with coworkers to improve your lives at work. "You have the right to act with coworkers to address work-related issues in many ways. Examples include: talking with one or more co-workers about your wages and benefits or other working conditions, circulating a petition asking for better hours, participating in a concerted refusal to work in unsafe conditions, and joining with coworkers to talk directly to your employer, to a government agency, or to the media about problems in your workplace. Your employer cannot discharge, discipline, or threaten you for, or coercively question you about, this "protected concerted" activity." nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-w… nlrb.gov/resources/faq/nlrb nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-w…
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
If you had to choose one of these four people to be the next President of the United States, who would you choose?
Replying to @marwilliamson
That’s fine. Hire her back and do that but don’t put her on the schedule until she quits.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I suspect this will go all the way up to the Colorado Supreme Court, which is 100% guaranteed to do the wrong thing in an utterly partisan manner.
Replying to @marwilliamson
If it doesn't come with a massive punitive fine it's toothless and Starbucks has no incentive to change.