China has 22,000 miles of high-speed rail and we’re still celebrating every 200 miles we can get.      High-speed rail is 8 times more energy efficient than airplanes and 4 times more efficient than cars. The challenges are great but we need to keep pushing for it. scientificamerican.com/artic…

Dec 9, 2023 · 12:48 PM UTC

95
256
12
1,115
Replying to @marwilliamson
Environmental impact studies Private property rights Infrastructure upkeep A public already suffering from inflation fatigue Should I go on?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Go home. Stop grifting off of gullible progressives. Better still…go to China.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
China's rail sysyem is a joke and a massive debt issue for them. It doesnt make sense for mass adoption for the US. If we can price it competitively in the Northeast, maybe the Texas Triangle and LA to Vegas, maybe there, otherwise it doesnt work for US.
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
they also don't have human rights...
Replying to @marwilliamson
Go live in China.
1
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Gee Marianne it’s really easy to compare us to an authoritarian regime that can build things by fiat and uses slave labor, displaces people from their homes and land when theirs no respect for property rights! Are you suggesting we be more like the CCP? Not a good look!
1
It's annoying you tell us things we already know. You never give us a step by step proposal on what you would do about it and how you would make it happen.
3
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
The problem we face with high-speed trains is the land and building materials… what is the carbon footprint 👣 for acquiring the materials and building the infrastructure? Then what source of energy will fuel the train?
4
1
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
San Francisco to LA would have been a good test. But the cost just kept going up and up (and up and up)...and up and up ....that they stopped building it, and even if they did build it, to recover those costs it would be price prohibitive to a vast majority of Californians.
9
2
13