The issue is not that we don’t have solutions to humanity’s problems. The issue is that people with solutions don’t have the power, and people with power too often don’t want to hear about real solutions. 1/3
42
221
17
1,002
At a certain point, you can’t have it both ways. You can either prioritize the survival of your democracy, species and planet, or you can allow the dictates of an unfettered capitalist economy to take priority over those things. 2/3

Nov 24, 2023 · 11:09 AM UTC

6
43
4
224
In theory it’s supposed to be government’s job to broker a balance between individual liberty - including economic liberty - with concern for the Common Good. In fact the former now reigns at the expense of the latter, putting humanity into a tailspin. 3/3
14
34
3
186
Replying to @marwilliamson
So, I have solutions. How do we submit those to your campaign?
Replying to @marwilliamson
I offer: pledges of demilitarization. Small, peaceful and less powerful nations (and costa rica) offer to dearm if every nation does so as well. It galvanizes the left. More nations make the empty pledge. We use money from militaries on UBI. A candidate that promises that. Wins.
So simply put, do you want the world to survive or is what you can get to day more important than the world? This does not have to be a choice about your shopping habits. it's a choice about who you vote for marianne Williamson's is the person to make the changes we need !
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Menace to society is often not the problem when speaking in longevity terms, it is the ethical morals missing in action...