Replying to @marwilliamson
You must have yet to actually read into this topic...
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
The Fedrlst-Paprs + the Preamble, confirm that the purpose of the Consttution is to preserve liberty frm tyranny by avoiding concentrtion of powr in any cul de sac of society or govt. The founders didnt anticipate the ltd liablty corp so thats the loop hole for undoing the Const
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I doubt that he’s serious, he’s just anticipating a challenge from the populist left. A more serious measure would be a more nuanced measure: eliminated funded lobbying. Sure the Constitution provides for lobbying, but not in exchange for money, comfort or other consideration.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Could you be any more credulous? 🙄
Replying to @marwilliamson
How is it this douche? As traitor? So sad
Replying to @marwilliamson
So divisive
Replying to @marwilliamson
Oh Marianne, if only you could read the bill before posting such nonsense.
Legislation cannot undo a #SCOTUS ruling based on the #1A. If @HawleyMO wants to change that, he should follow Article V of our #Constitution.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Haven’t read the entire piece yet. I see corporate public money. What about private billionaire funded groups? Will look for the poison pill in the plan.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Wow Way to elevate R over your “ fellow Democrats”, including in this case, Sen @BernieSanders , who in every Congress, I believe introduces a bill, Did you even vet the issue? Or is it just Dems bashing as usually Which party, you are running for?
2
10