Federal red flag laws do not infringe on the 2nd Amendment. Universal background checks do not infringe on the 2nd Amendment. Banning assault weapons does not infringe on the 2nd Amendment. Banning high-capacity magazines & bump stocks does not infringe on the 2nd amendment.

Oct 27, 2023 · 12:59 AM UTC

731
117
73
578
Replying to @marwilliamson
Courts seem to disagree with you.
Replying to @marwilliamson
All of those things infringe on the 2nd Amendment. If you don't like it, change the Constitution if you dare.
4
2
83
Replying to @marwilliamson
Here for the RATIO!! For someone who has absolutely no idea how the thing infringe rights 1A, 2A, 4A, 5A, 6A, and the famous 14A!!!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Do you understand the English language? Look up "infringe" and "shall not" while you're at it.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
And yes means no, and blue means red.
Replying to @marwilliamson
What’s the purpose of red flag laws? It’s to disarm people without their consent. Thus, Unconstitutional. What’s the purpose of universal background checks? To delay the process of purchasing a gun, and prevent people from arming themselves. Thus Unconstitutional. Banning Guns? Not a violation of 2A? Ok you never go full demotard, everyone knows that, yet here you are. Thus, Unconstitutional. Banning High capacity magazines? I agree, no one should have a 1,000 round magazine in their firearm because they can’t carry it and shoot accurately… unless they can, and if they can, they should be able to. Banning bump stocks? Same thing, decreased accuracy, I don’t like em, but if you can shoot it accurately then you should be able to own and use one. Thus, Unconstitutional. Your whole post is about destroying the constitution. Fuck you. No.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Please provide your historical analogues that support your point otherwise you're just making things up.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Stick to your crystals