Ask anyone who isn't in politics and you'll all get the same answer when you ask about Biden. You can be offended by that answer, but it doesn't change the facts on the ground. In fact, this is so true, you all already know what I'm going to say. Everyone says, "He's too old."
343
30
21
301
Name a viable alternative.
1
3
Marianne Williamson is completely viable. People do not think she is because she is a woman. Cenk should use his platform to support her like they did for Bernie.
2
2
1
13
What does "viable" mean to you? She can't get 12 votes.
4
1
If you and I really want to call ourselves progressive men, we need to be serious culture critics as well.
1
2
What does that have to do with the above discussion about viable candidates?
1
1
1. Cenk's not even legally viable to run. The law is the law. You have to be a natural-born citizen. The Courts will never allow that - because that's the law. 2. She's not viable because progressive folks like you aren't willing to support her - because she's a woman.
1
1
1. Of course. 2. Her complete lack of any experience which is relevant and important for the job is why almost no one supports her. But yeah, it must be that she's a woman. (good lord, are you even real?)
2
1
“Relevant experience” means to you the technical experience to drive the car that drove us into a ditch. The problem is not that we do not have enough car mechanics in Washington. The problem is that we’re on the wrong road.

Oct 13, 2023 · 6:41 PM UTC

2
1
4
Marianne, I belittled you for the longest time because I bought into mainstream media narratives, but mainly because I gave into my own misogyny. I played willful ignorance because you are a woman. I want to apologize to you personally, and I am all in on your campaign.
2
How does someone with no driving experience get that car out of the ditch, much less onto the "right road"? Somehow the power of your ideas is going to overcome your complete lack of political experience? If my mechanic couldn't fix my car, I wouldn't take it to a baker.
1
1