Strict signature verification laws are a tactic used by Republicans to suppress the vote – especially poor voters and voters of color – and the laws have been condemned by Democrats, including the Georgia Democratic Party. Yet now the Democrats are using the same tactics to suppress democracy in Atlanta. Stop Cop City! pbs.org/newshour/politics/ac…

Aug 26, 2023 · 5:18 AM UTC

47
52
6
234
Replying to @marwilliamson
Suppressing the vote with strict signature verifications is just as bad as allowing non-US citizens or people with little verification to vote. Many states use simple driver licenses. What could be easier than that?
Replying to @marwilliamson
You’re being suppressed. How do you like that? You’re voice,erased.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Are you serious? How do you think Obama was first elected to the senate? He took his opening to court and had tons of signatures thrown out simply because people printed their Instead of signing. Both parties are hypocrite assholes who don't deserve our votes
Replying to @marwilliamson
This wouldn't even be an issue if ID was required to vote. Are driver's licenses racist? Is requiring ID to do anything else concerning the government racist? Give me a break.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I really appreciate your struggle against the machine for your voice to be heard to a much wider American audience. And that Joe would debate with you. Any American POTUS candidate should imo. 🫡🇺🇸
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
Strict signature verification laws? You must not have been following the Kari Lake appeal. The average time spent matching signatures is approximately 2 seconds.
Replying to @marwilliamson
y'know what's bad about the nuke water dump? about 70~80% of the world's oxygen is being produced by seaweed and phytoplankton, which the nuke water could kill en masse
Radiation in the water will be diluted to almost-background levels, but some researchers are not sure this will be sufficient to mitigate the risks. #Fukushima #Fukushimawater nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦‍♂️
Replying to @marwilliamson
I guess the same goes for cashing checks? I'll believe you mean what you write, you call for the removal of signatures on driving licenses, checks, credit cards, loans, etc... Until then, I'll assume, your tweet is evidence that you are conspiring to commit voter fraud.
1