Replying to @marwilliamson
Why is it that I'm just now hearing about Russian use of the munitions, supposedly since the start of the war? Has there any independent verification? Shouldn't be hard to document, close to 10% of the bomblets don't explode. Evidence should be lying all around, if true
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I agree ... bad decision ... It reeks of ... DESPERATION ... A move that could alienate European support ... and ... dampen people's support for Ukraine ... A BIG MISTAKE!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Diplomacy and trade is better than war. If it happens, doing what can be done to shorten war is more humane than allowing it to linger on.
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Cluster bombs are banned by most nations in the world, and the Biden admin even called their usage 'war crimes' at one point. It's absurd that they're now going to use them. What's next, nukes? WCGW?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
And where were you when Russia used 6 types of cluster bombs daily in Ukraine including 1. "Hurricane" 2. "Smerch" 3. "Tornado-S" 4. Missile systems "Tochka" 5. "Iskander-M", 6. RBC bombs -500 with PTAB-1M submunitions. You were silent or just a Russia Asset? Thanks to Biden!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Name one current Democrat in congress that has enough humanity to stand against this war.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
There is no defense, @JoeBiden!!
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Saving soldiers from mine fields is terrible idea.
Replying to @marwilliamson
It is a difficult decision. Russians use them indiscriminately while Ukraine's President is vouching to only use them when five conditions are met. We know if Russia is not stopped they will come back for more to fulfill Putin's dream.
1
1