They overturned Roe v. Wade. They ended Affirmative Action. Now they've rejected Biden's student loan forgiveness plan. Today's SCOTUS works to proactively diminish the rights and opportunities of the people of the United States. (Biden can get around this, by the way.) 1/2

Jun 30, 2023 · 3:07 PM UTC

261
670
28
5,146
As President, I will expand the Court if necessary. Nothing in the Constitution says it's limited to 9 justices. We must also introduce ethics rules for SCOTUS justices, and consider term limits. Our current SCOTUS has gone rogue in service to their corporatist sponsors.2/2
123
219
30
1,848
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
And in the concurrence they say the quet part out loud. They don't care what the law says. They are the law in their own mind.
Nope🇺🇸 @LordGem3
30 Jun 2023
Never forget, they know what the statute says and just told you they don't care. From Barret's concurrence on the striking down of student debt cancellation. The quiet part is said very much aloud. The administration's is right, but they want to sub in their values.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Biden just takes what the court dished out!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Let the @DNC if they don’t go by the peoples will in the primary them and Democratic Party will BE DONE!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Student loan forgiveness was always going to be struck down. A program like that needs to be done through Congress, not a stroke of a pen.
Replying to @marwilliamson
On the student loan forgiveness thingy... In our system of "creation of money supply" since losing the Gold Standard, total aggregate loans can NEVER be paid off, or the rich will be forced to trickle down their wealth to do so. They want all loans "rolled" down to "the Poor".
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s almost like they’re upholding the constitution.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
"They ended Affirmative Action" is largely exaggerating 🤷‍♂️ No law required those colleges to consider racial factors for admission. They did voluntarily and now are found to be unconstitutional.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Let's change the rules when the outcome is not what we like sounds very democratic
Replying to @marwilliamson
What are you talking about? They've just proactively expanded the rights and opportunities of Asian-Americans. Asian-Americans are also the people of the United States, right? Or will they always be outsiders according to you?
1
Load more