The survival of our species will in many ways turn on whether enough of us make the transition from "What's in it for me?" to "What's in it for us?"

Jun 10, 2023 · 11:51 PM UTC

108
175
23
770
Replying to @marwilliamson
No thats not it because people dont care. It will take laws and jail sesensentences. Polluters will never voluntary stop polluting
Replying to @marwilliamson
And that philosophy is the fascist in you. Your side assume you know what's best for everyone and push your insane policies on the rest of us.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Just a little Communism coming from good old Marianne.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Notice the difference in Republican candidates?
See the difference? TRUMP 2024 🇺🇸
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Without the individual there is no us. What we do for others we do for God and for our selves. What we do for God we do for others and our selves. Finally what we do for ourselves we do for God and others.
Replying to @marwilliamson
What’s good for all of us as individuals is good for our society. This was the central idea of the renaissance and enlightenment.
1
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
Hyperbolic rhetoric like :survival of our species" undercuts your otherwise laudable ideas (and your candidacy.)
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Let me fix it. The survival of our species depends on making sure that people aren’t allowed to make shit up and use force to make you believe it. Thats the core of it for me. Do you believe in objective reality or is science a power game to you. The latter can destroy all