The fundamental economic problem in the United States has less to do with how much money we spend and everything to do with what we spend it on. We spend huge amounts on things that reduce the life force of the nation: tax cuts for the wealthy, corporate subsidies, and war. Meanwhile, we withhold money from things that help people thrive, and thus create more good/produce more money themselves: health, education, and the well being of our communities. America is in a decline because we continue to do things that decrease the wellbeing of our people -- all so that a ridiculously small portion of our population can do better and better. We will not pull out of our decline until and unless we are willing to fundamentally change. We will either continue to fall - and make no mistake about it, our political status quo is a trajectory of decline - or we will consciously and proactively rise. The decision lies in each of our hands.
115
258
20
1,175
The flaw in your "thinking" is taking with out creation is virtue. The rich don't take, they create things for which people willingly pay to have. Taking with out creation is what you and your cohorts believe is virtue. It is not virtue it is wrong headed.
2
Replying to @Book_meister
You’re saying the work of a wealthy person is more inherently valuable than the work of someone who is not wealthy. I disagree. And your vision of a country in which the very very wealthy are constantly giving back to society is like a fairytale - some fanciful version of what is actually happening. That trickle down delusion has led us to where we are: the largest income inequality in over 100 years. It certainly did not lift all boats; it has left millions and millions of people without even a life vest.

Jun 10, 2023 · 11:34 AM UTC

1
13
Actually, he seems to think that the rich create without labor, which is a fantasy. Labor is instrumental in creation, so labor should share in the rewards. The question is how much, and he seems to think the answer is 'nothing.'
1