The fundamental economic problem in the United States has less to do with how much money we spend and everything to do with what we spend it on. We spend huge amounts on things that reduce the life force of the nation: tax cuts for the wealthy, corporate subsidies, and war. Meanwhile, we withhold money from things that help people thrive, and thus create more good/produce more money themselves: health, education, and the well being of our communities. America is in a decline because we continue to do things that decrease the wellbeing of our people -- all so that a ridiculously small portion of our population can do better and better. We will not pull out of our decline until and unless we are willing to fundamentally change. We will either continue to fall - and make no mistake about it, our political status quo is a trajectory of decline - or we will consciously and proactively rise. The decision lies in each of our hands.

Jun 10, 2023 · 10:10 AM UTC

115
258
20
1,175
Tax cuts to the very wealthy are given under the canard that those people will then create more jobs and add to the economy. Evidence is clearly otherwise. The 2017 tax cut - where 83 cents of every dollar went into the hands of the wealthiest Individuals and corporations - will never pay for itself. Giving tax cuts to companies already making billions in profit did not make them invest; the money mainly went to stock buybacks etc. When corporatists talk about reducing the deficit, they are only willing to do so on the backs of the middle class and poor. They are never willing to spend money on catching wealthy tax cheats, repealing unfair tax cuts to the very wealthy, or increasing investment in things that actually support the average person in creating more wealth. The problem is not one individual policy here or there. The problem is big picture: a state of aristocracy and corporate entitlement now baked into the cake in America - the very opposite of a free democratic society in which everyone is supposed to have a fair shot. The current system makes a mockery of the very idea of "unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." As the late Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said, "We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." #Disruptthesystem
12
59
2
289
Replying to @marwilliamson
The flaw in your "thinking" is taking with out creation is virtue. The rich don't take, they create things for which people willingly pay to have. Taking with out creation is what you and your cohorts believe is virtue. It is not virtue it is wrong headed.
2
You’re saying the work of a wealthy person is more inherently valuable than the work of someone who is not wealthy. I disagree. And your vision of a country in which the very very wealthy are constantly giving back to society is like a fairytale - some fanciful version of what is actually happening. That trickle down delusion has led us to where we are: the largest income inequality in over 100 years. It certainly did not lift all boats; it has left millions and millions of people without even a life vest.
1
13
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sounds like socialism. No thanks.
18
3
No it doesn’t. It sounds like the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address.
7
11
1
110
Replying to @marwilliamson
Kudos for identifying the issues, but problem solving requires requisite experience in administration and policy making. We need more than tweeting the obvious. How are you gonna fix it is the question? And please don't say you'll surround yourself with the 'best and brightest'.
5
1
1
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
"Tax cuts" are not spending.
8
3
Actually, they are.
3
1
56
Replying to @marwilliamson
The life force of the nation? This isn’t Star Wars or Pocahontas honey
6
2
And this isn’t The 20th century anymore, where only the most transactional language is considered a sophisticated conversation.
2
4
1
69